Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Recent bioarchaeological analyses at the Neolithic Anatolian site of Çatalhöyük have revealed considerable variation in skeletal completeness, preservation, articulation, and flexion among burials. Furthermore, organic remains from burnt contexts demonstrate that many bodies were tightly bound and wrapped using cordage, matting, textile, and animal hides. Some of the observed variation is suggestive of a period of delay between death and final burial for certain individuals, likely as part of a multi-stage funerary rite, perhaps seasonal in nature. It appears that some bodies may have been processed in such a way as to facilitate their temporary storage prior to burial. We examined bone samples from 57 Çatalhöyük individuals using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging techniques to determine whether specific funerary treatments can be associated with specific patterns of microstructural preservation. As endogenous gut bacteria released into the body at the onset of putrefaction are believed by some researchers to be responsible for particular patterns of microscopical focal destruction (MFD) observed in cortical bone, the lack of such bio-erosive features has been used to infer anthropogenic treatments aimed at reducing soft tissue body mass. A previous study of skeletal material from Çatalhöyük claimed to identify bacterial bioerosion in rib thin sections but did not make use of SEM. In the present study, our analyses reveal limited evidence for bacterial MFD, which highlights the fact that standard light microscopy is insufficient for properly documenting microbial bioerosion. While there is a range of variation among other taphonomic variables observed in the current study, it is difficult to associate this variability with specific human interventions. Furthermore, the complex role of local environmental and depositional factors must also be taken into account. As such, caution must be taken when using the presence/absence of bioerosion in human bone alone to assess ancient funerary practices.

Original languageEnglish
Article number74
JournalArchaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Volume15
Issue number6
ISSN1866-9557
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The first author is grateful to a number of individuals for providing valuable expertise and feedback on this research, in particular Gordon Turner-Walker, Matthew Collins, and Hayley Mickleburgh.

Funding Information:
This research was funded in part by a 2017–2018 Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) fellowship, a 2018–2019 British Academy Newton Advanced Fellowship (NAFR1180202), and a 2019–2021 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (GAP-837781) awarded to the first author. This project received funding from the French State under the auspices of the “Investments for the future” Program, IdEx (Initiative d’Excellence) of the University of Bordeaux, reference ANR-10-IDEX-03–02 (to CJK). Schotsmans’ research participation was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 794891) with the University of Bordeaux and the Australian Research Council (DE210101384).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

    Research areas

  • Anatolia, Funerary practices, Histology, Neolithic, Taphonomy

ID: 372319178