Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. / Haddow, Scott D.; Mazzucato, Camilla; Mangaloğlu-Votruba, Sıla; Yağcı, Barış; Booth, Thomas; Schotsmans, Eline M.J.; Knüsel, Christopher J.

In: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 6, 74, 06.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Haddow, SD, Mazzucato, C, Mangaloğlu-Votruba, S, Yağcı, B, Booth, T, Schotsmans, EMJ & Knüsel, CJ 2023, 'Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük', Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01756-x

APA

Haddow, S. D., Mazzucato, C., Mangaloğlu-Votruba, S., Yağcı, B., Booth, T., Schotsmans, E. M. J., & Knüsel, C. J. (2023). Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 15(6), [74]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01756-x

Vancouver

Haddow SD, Mazzucato C, Mangaloğlu-Votruba S, Yağcı B, Booth T, Schotsmans EMJ et al. Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2023 Jun;15(6). 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01756-x

Author

Haddow, Scott D. ; Mazzucato, Camilla ; Mangaloğlu-Votruba, Sıla ; Yağcı, Barış ; Booth, Thomas ; Schotsmans, Eline M.J. ; Knüsel, Christopher J. / Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2023 ; Vol. 15, No. 6.

Bibtex

@article{ba6f152b230b4ba3a6dbf016591be238,
title = "Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k",
abstract = "Recent bioarchaeological analyses at the Neolithic Anatolian site of {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k have revealed considerable variation in skeletal completeness, preservation, articulation, and flexion among burials. Furthermore, organic remains from burnt contexts demonstrate that many bodies were tightly bound and wrapped using cordage, matting, textile, and animal hides. Some of the observed variation is suggestive of a period of delay between death and final burial for certain individuals, likely as part of a multi-stage funerary rite, perhaps seasonal in nature. It appears that some bodies may have been processed in such a way as to facilitate their temporary storage prior to burial. We examined bone samples from 57 {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k individuals using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging techniques to determine whether specific funerary treatments can be associated with specific patterns of microstructural preservation. As endogenous gut bacteria released into the body at the onset of putrefaction are believed by some researchers to be responsible for particular patterns of microscopical focal destruction (MFD) observed in cortical bone, the lack of such bio-erosive features has been used to infer anthropogenic treatments aimed at reducing soft tissue body mass. A previous study of skeletal material from {\c C}atalh{\"o}y{\"u}k claimed to identify bacterial bioerosion in rib thin sections but did not make use of SEM. In the present study, our analyses reveal limited evidence for bacterial MFD, which highlights the fact that standard light microscopy is insufficient for properly documenting microbial bioerosion. While there is a range of variation among other taphonomic variables observed in the current study, it is difficult to associate this variability with specific human interventions. Furthermore, the complex role of local environmental and depositional factors must also be taken into account. As such, caution must be taken when using the presence/absence of bioerosion in human bone alone to assess ancient funerary practices.",
keywords = "Anatolia, Funerary practices, Histology, Neolithic, Taphonomy",
author = "Haddow, {Scott D.} and Camilla Mazzucato and Sıla Mangaloğlu-Votruba and Barı{\c s} Yağcı and Thomas Booth and Schotsmans, {Eline M.J.} and Kn{\"u}sel, {Christopher J.}",
note = "Funding Information: The first author is grateful to a number of individuals for providing valuable expertise and feedback on this research, in particular Gordon Turner-Walker, Matthew Collins, and Hayley Mickleburgh. Funding Information: This research was funded in part by a 2017–2018 Ko{\c c} University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) fellowship, a 2018–2019 British Academy Newton Advanced Fellowship (NAFR1180202), and a 2019–2021 Marie Sk{\l}odowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (GAP-837781) awarded to the first author. This project received funding from the French State under the auspices of the “Investments for the future” Program, IdEx (Initiative d{\textquoteright}Excellence) of the University of Bordeaux, reference ANR-10-IDEX-03–02 (to CJK). Schotsmans{\textquoteright} research participation was funded by the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 794891) with the University of Bordeaux and the Australian Research Council (DE210101384). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s12520-023-01756-x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences",
issn = "1866-9557",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scratching the surface? A histotaphonomic study of human remains at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

AU - Haddow, Scott D.

AU - Mazzucato, Camilla

AU - Mangaloğlu-Votruba, Sıla

AU - Yağcı, Barış

AU - Booth, Thomas

AU - Schotsmans, Eline M.J.

AU - Knüsel, Christopher J.

N1 - Funding Information: The first author is grateful to a number of individuals for providing valuable expertise and feedback on this research, in particular Gordon Turner-Walker, Matthew Collins, and Hayley Mickleburgh. Funding Information: This research was funded in part by a 2017–2018 Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) fellowship, a 2018–2019 British Academy Newton Advanced Fellowship (NAFR1180202), and a 2019–2021 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (GAP-837781) awarded to the first author. This project received funding from the French State under the auspices of the “Investments for the future” Program, IdEx (Initiative d’Excellence) of the University of Bordeaux, reference ANR-10-IDEX-03–02 (to CJK). Schotsmans’ research participation was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 794891) with the University of Bordeaux and the Australian Research Council (DE210101384). Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2023/6

Y1 - 2023/6

N2 - Recent bioarchaeological analyses at the Neolithic Anatolian site of Çatalhöyük have revealed considerable variation in skeletal completeness, preservation, articulation, and flexion among burials. Furthermore, organic remains from burnt contexts demonstrate that many bodies were tightly bound and wrapped using cordage, matting, textile, and animal hides. Some of the observed variation is suggestive of a period of delay between death and final burial for certain individuals, likely as part of a multi-stage funerary rite, perhaps seasonal in nature. It appears that some bodies may have been processed in such a way as to facilitate their temporary storage prior to burial. We examined bone samples from 57 Çatalhöyük individuals using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging techniques to determine whether specific funerary treatments can be associated with specific patterns of microstructural preservation. As endogenous gut bacteria released into the body at the onset of putrefaction are believed by some researchers to be responsible for particular patterns of microscopical focal destruction (MFD) observed in cortical bone, the lack of such bio-erosive features has been used to infer anthropogenic treatments aimed at reducing soft tissue body mass. A previous study of skeletal material from Çatalhöyük claimed to identify bacterial bioerosion in rib thin sections but did not make use of SEM. In the present study, our analyses reveal limited evidence for bacterial MFD, which highlights the fact that standard light microscopy is insufficient for properly documenting microbial bioerosion. While there is a range of variation among other taphonomic variables observed in the current study, it is difficult to associate this variability with specific human interventions. Furthermore, the complex role of local environmental and depositional factors must also be taken into account. As such, caution must be taken when using the presence/absence of bioerosion in human bone alone to assess ancient funerary practices.

AB - Recent bioarchaeological analyses at the Neolithic Anatolian site of Çatalhöyük have revealed considerable variation in skeletal completeness, preservation, articulation, and flexion among burials. Furthermore, organic remains from burnt contexts demonstrate that many bodies were tightly bound and wrapped using cordage, matting, textile, and animal hides. Some of the observed variation is suggestive of a period of delay between death and final burial for certain individuals, likely as part of a multi-stage funerary rite, perhaps seasonal in nature. It appears that some bodies may have been processed in such a way as to facilitate their temporary storage prior to burial. We examined bone samples from 57 Çatalhöyük individuals using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging techniques to determine whether specific funerary treatments can be associated with specific patterns of microstructural preservation. As endogenous gut bacteria released into the body at the onset of putrefaction are believed by some researchers to be responsible for particular patterns of microscopical focal destruction (MFD) observed in cortical bone, the lack of such bio-erosive features has been used to infer anthropogenic treatments aimed at reducing soft tissue body mass. A previous study of skeletal material from Çatalhöyük claimed to identify bacterial bioerosion in rib thin sections but did not make use of SEM. In the present study, our analyses reveal limited evidence for bacterial MFD, which highlights the fact that standard light microscopy is insufficient for properly documenting microbial bioerosion. While there is a range of variation among other taphonomic variables observed in the current study, it is difficult to associate this variability with specific human interventions. Furthermore, the complex role of local environmental and depositional factors must also be taken into account. As such, caution must be taken when using the presence/absence of bioerosion in human bone alone to assess ancient funerary practices.

KW - Anatolia

KW - Funerary practices

KW - Histology

KW - Neolithic

KW - Taphonomy

U2 - 10.1007/s12520-023-01756-x

DO - 10.1007/s12520-023-01756-x

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85159079056

VL - 15

JO - Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

JF - Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

SN - 1866-9557

IS - 6

M1 - 74

ER -

ID: 372319178